Default Notice Issued as Stormwater Contamination Battle with Fort Bragg Escalates
Fort Bragg's failure to respond to allegations by the mill site owners adds new twist in $10–50 million lawsuit over allegedly toxic stormwater and dioxin contamination.

3:28 p.m. Sept. 11: our story was updated to clarify that default was entered by a clerk, not a judge.
A court clerk on Tuesday entered a default notice in response to a request by to Sierra Northern Railway and Mendocino Railway in a case they filed against the city of Fort Bragg.
The railways sued the city in August 2024 over ongoing contamination of Mill Pond 8, located on the site of the former Georgia-Pacific lumber mill, by hazardous substances including dioxins and furans.
According to the railways, the city discharged untreated, hazardous stormwater onto their private property for years, effectively transforming the eight-acre pond into an unlicensed toxic waste dump.
The companies are seeking between $10 million and $50 million for investigation, remediation and cleanup.
The judgment comes amid a long pause in litigation between the city and the railways. The lawsuits date back four years, when the Mendocino Railway first sought to use eminent domain to take possession of 292 acres of the mill site owned by Georgia-Pacific. The lumber company had previously sold 77 acres to the railway.
At the time, Fort Bragg was negotiating what it believed was a good-faith agreement to buy the property from Georgia-Pacific. The company initially fought the railway’s eminent domain effort in court, arguing that “public interest and necessity do not require the proposed project.” But within three months it agreed to settle and hand over the parcels in exchange for $1.2 million.
Before the sale could be ratified in court, Fort Bragg sued. The city sought a ruling on a single question: could Mendocino Railway, which operates the Skunk Train, be considered a public utility? The city also asked a judge to require the railway to comply with municipal ordinances and regulations.
The California Coastal Commission joined the city’s case on Oct. 27, 2022. Mendocino Railway responded by suing the city and the commission in federal court, requesting an injunction to prevent interference in its operations. A federal judge dismissed that lawsuit, and a federal appeals court upheld the ruling on Aug. 29, 2024.
On Nov. 25, 2024, following the election of two new councilmembers — Scott Hockett and Marcia Rafanan — the city and the railway jointly asked for a 90-day stay in litigation to explore settlement terms. The stay has since been repeatedly extended while the two sides negotiate a master development agreement.
Meanwhile, the lawsuit over the allegedly toxic stormwater continued. The railways filed their first complaint in August 2024, then filed amended complaints in November and December. Fort Bragg responded in February 2025, arguing that the railways had no cause of action under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act. The city said the claim was not tied to actual remedial action and that the railways themselves were potentially responsible parties, further disqualifying their claim.
Because the railways had already amended their pleadings twice, the city argued that further amendments would be “futile.”
But the railways went ahead and filed a third amended complaint on Aug. 4, 2025. When the city did not respond, the railways filed a motion for default judgment, which was entered into the record on Tuesday.
On Wednesday, city officials joined the public and the Coastal Commission on a mill site tour offered by the railways to coincide with the commission’s September meeting, being held this week in Fort Bragg. A Mendo Local editor informed City Manager Isaac Whippy of the default during the tour. We will add the city’s statement when it is available.
Robert Pinoli, president and CEO of Mendocino Railway, acknowledged the ongoing cooperative efforts between the city and the railways in an interview with Mendo Local during the tour, but he says the railways want the city to pay. “The fact of the matter is that there continues to be a discharge of stormwater into the very ponds and area that people want remediated,” he said. “It’s one thing to say, ‘OK, landowner, go remediate the property,’ but if the very next day more pollutants are coming out, then the remediation is for nothing.”
Elise,
Your headline is misleading.
The Clerk entering the Default against the City of Fort Bragg does not constitute a Default Judgment. Only Judge Jon Tiger can make a default ruling. Judge Tiger has set a new deadline for a Joint Case Management Statement for November 11, so the case is not clearly over yet.
The Federal District Court Pacer document system for the Sierra Northern Railway & Mendocino Railway case (https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?433862) contains two entries for September 9, 2025:
(50) "Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Jon S. Tigar: Initial Case Management Conference held on 9/9/2025. Case status discussed. No appearance by the Defendant. Joint Case Management Statement due by 11/12/2025. Further Case Management Conference set for 11/18/2025 at 02:00 PM - Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.
"Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/jst
"Court Appearances: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. One list of names of all counsel appearing for all parties must be sent in one email to the CRD at jstcrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than 11/17/2025 at 2:00PM PST.
"Civ LR 77-3(d). Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.
"Zoom Guidance and Setup: https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/.
"Total Time in Court: 6 minutes. Court Reporter: Not Reported. Plaintiff Attorney: David Diepenbrock. Defendant Attorney: No Appearance. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (dms, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 9/9/2025) (Entered: 09/09/2025)"
And (51) "Clerk's Notice of ENTRY OF DEFAULT against Defendant City of Fort Bragg. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (Related documents(s) 49 )(tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2025) (Entered: 09/09/2025)"