It is not thorough! It is misleading and harmful! This is clearly written by an individual who has no intentions of protecting or helping others. It is clearly trying to get likes and followers. Heartless
His legal status makes him "eligible" for deportation if the U.S. finds another country. In this case it found St. Kitts. Ffriend had been doing voluntary compliance checks -- going down to San Francisco. The agents came up to Willits and roughed him up and put him in the deportation pipeline. The writ of Habeas Corpus and the Temporary Restraining Order will allow him to challenge his deportation. It will be up to a federal judge. This is how things are working. I am wondering, based on comments made to Ffriend and his family, if there's a policy to remove these specific kinds of cases and if that would explain the remark (we're on the "fs"). According to a 2023 CAT Policy Brief, only 0.007% of applicants were granted CAT protection annually at the time the brief was compiled. (CAT stands for Convention Against Torture — individuals with this legal status have protections under the convention).
After being tackled and handcuffed (un-necessary and demeaning), he was taken to a detention facility in Southern California and then released from there much later (not sure how long he was in detention), needing to find his own way home. ICE also did not have a warrant to enter private property. There are so many things wrong with that. ICE is behaving like a mob, trying to disappear our neighbors. We should all be outraged.
Thank you for your thorough reporting.
It is not thorough! It is misleading and harmful! This is clearly written by an individual who has no intentions of protecting or helping others. It is clearly trying to get likes and followers. Heartless
What are you talking about?
Legal!
Waste of tax dollars which provides no benefit to anyone; only hardship.
You have misquoted me several times in this article. 😒
Colby, please give me a call and we will get those quotes fixed.
Is he legal or not?
Legal
That's the way I read it also. What is the issue? It sounds like he was questioned and left alone. Am I missing something?
His legal status makes him "eligible" for deportation if the U.S. finds another country. In this case it found St. Kitts. Ffriend had been doing voluntary compliance checks -- going down to San Francisco. The agents came up to Willits and roughed him up and put him in the deportation pipeline. The writ of Habeas Corpus and the Temporary Restraining Order will allow him to challenge his deportation. It will be up to a federal judge. This is how things are working. I am wondering, based on comments made to Ffriend and his family, if there's a policy to remove these specific kinds of cases and if that would explain the remark (we're on the "fs"). According to a 2023 CAT Policy Brief, only 0.007% of applicants were granted CAT protection annually at the time the brief was compiled. (CAT stands for Convention Against Torture — individuals with this legal status have protections under the convention).
After being tackled and handcuffed (un-necessary and demeaning), he was taken to a detention facility in Southern California and then released from there much later (not sure how long he was in detention), needing to find his own way home. ICE also did not have a warrant to enter private property. There are so many things wrong with that. ICE is behaving like a mob, trying to disappear our neighbors. We should all be outraged.